District running for: Ill 6th
Political/civic background: Burr Ridge Village Board 1989-1993
Education: Phillips Exeter Academy Exeter, N.H. cum laude
Oberlin College 1961-1964 no degree-phi beta kappa
Harvard Medical School 1968
IIT- Kent Law School 1 year 1988
Campaign website: www.citizensforrobertmarshall.com
Chicago Sun-Times Editorial Board questionnaire responses
Q) What are your three top national legislative priorities for the country?
A) Ending the "War on Drugs" throughout this country. This has been an extremely damaging and expensive program. Marijuana should be legalized nationwide and treatment programs should be expanded for other drugs.
Campaign finance reform. Citizens United should be repealed. There should be public support of federal campaigns. For example, there could be matching funds for campaigns up to $50,000.00.
Decreasing Medicare age to 62. This age group has trouble finding jobs and therefore trouble getting insurance. Decreasing the eligibility age down would help this group greatly. Beginning a Medicare dental plan also would be a good idea.
Q: What are the three most important issues in your district on which you believe the federal government needs to act?
A) Increasing drug treatment programs for more addictive drugs. Deaths due to overdoses are a growing problem in the Chicagoland suburbs. If these people received proper medication and treatment there would be a marked decrease in mortalities.
Populous states, cities and suburbs need more representation in Washington. Most reforms require a Constitutional Amendment which is impossible to achieve. With my plan the largest states would be divided up into smaller states. Illinois would be divided up into 4 new independent states: 1. Chicago, 2. Suburban Cook, 3. North Illiniois, for instance, north of Route 80, 4. South Illinois, the rest of the state south of Route 80. Each new state would have more power since it would have 2 Senators and 2 more votes in the Electoral College.
Preserving Social Security and Medicare. See other areas of this questionnaire. Because of the large population benefiting from these programs, it is necessary to preserve them as they are.
Q) What is your biggest fundamental difference with your opponent(s)?
A) I am not an establishment type of candidate. From the candidate I am supporting for President, (Sanders), to many of the programs I am proposing on this form I am not a typical run of the mill candidate. This country and Illinois have very serious problems and small Band-Aid solutions will not work. I am my own man and I am not a career politician. I am a private citizen with ideas that most people do not even think about.
Q) Will you pledge to make public: a) your campaign schedule; b) your fundraiser schedule and the names of all fundraiser hosts ; c) if elected, your daily schedule of meetings? If not, why not?
Q) Please list all relatives on public or campaign payrolls and their jobs on those payrolls.
Q) What are the most important actions Congress can take to reduce the threat of ISIS abroad and at home?
A) We have to realize that ISIS conducts terrorist activity as a response to our invasion of Iraq and our subsequent actions there. We had no right to invade that country and no business staying there. We must stop the bombing now and withdraw all troops immediately. Our actions there are radicalizing young people everywhere. After we withdraw, ISIS will have no motivating factors to radicalize their victims.
After that, we can use old fashion police methods to track down lone wolf terrorists.
Q) What bans, if any, do you support on Muslim admissions to the United States? Please explain your position.
A) I do not think we need a permanent ban on admissions as Mr. Trump advises. If the State Department requires extra time to vet Muslim immigrants, I would not be opposed to that, but I would be against any blanket ban on people on the basis of their religion.
Q) Specifically, how would you have, or how did you, vote on the American Security Against Foreign Enemies (SAFE) Act of 2015 and its efforts to make it harder for Syrian and Iraqi refugees to enter the U.S.? Please explain your position.
A) I would not be opposed to allowing the State Department to take a few months more to vet Syrian and Iraqi refugees but in general I do not feel that we have a threat to this country from these refugees. Almost no terrorist has come from these two countries. In the past several years, the terrorists tend to come from almost every other country, mainly Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
Q) Do you support a Syrian no-fly zone or the U.S. enforcement of Syrian humanitarian safe zones? Why or why not?
A) I believe that we should withdraw all troops and Air Force personnel from Syria and Iraq. These people should solve their own problems and fight it out amongst themselves if necessary. The question of a no fly zone is therefore moot.
We should enforce Syrian humanitarian safe zones for obvious reasons.
Q) Regarding the House Benghazi Select Committee, should its investigation remain open-ended, or should the panel be given a deadline to complete its work? Please explain.
A) The Committee should end its investigation immediately. It is nothing more than a political circus show to decrease the poll numbers for Mrs. Clinton. More than one Republican Congressman has admitted this. All the Committee's work that it has done up to now should be discarded and thrown out. The Republican Party should be required to compensate the taxpayer 20 million dollars, which is the amount of money that has been wasted on these investigations.
Q) What measures, if any, do you support to give U.S. authorities access to encrypted or “dark web” communications about potential terrorist plots? Please explain.
A) I would support U.S. authorities having access to "dark web" communications about potential terrorist plots. This is the way to fight terrorism rather than invading countries and setting up corrupt puppet governments as we have tried to do in Viet Nam, Iran, Iraq and Syria. In the long run, these governments fail and the resultant mess does nothing more than threaten our country.
Q) Do you support transferring the detention of terrorism suspects from Guantanamo Bay to the United States? Why or why not?
A) There are fewer than 90 terrorists in Guantanamo Bay and therefore the question is almost moot, since there were several hundred a few years ago. In the near future, there will be very few there anyway. The few that require trial, should undergo trial in this country. There is a federal prison in the northwest area of Illinois and several years ago I talked to many people there and they are very eager to accept these terrorists and have their trial in that area.
Q) What is the single most important action Congress can take to reduce U.S. gun violence?
A) The single most important action Congress can take to reduce gun violence is to legalize drugs in this country. Most gun violence is caused by gangs and they are killing each other in order to make more money from the illegal drug trade. Marijuana should be legalized nationwide to cut out this business from the gangs. Harder drugs, such as heroine and cocaine should be decriminalized and the medical community should be allowed to prescribe these drugs or substitutes and therefore undercut this market also from these gangs.
Q) Do you support or oppose the ‘‘Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act?” Please explain your position.
A) I would support this act. I see no reasons why we should allow people who are on the terrorist list to obtain firearms and explosives. People should, however, have due process in determining whether they are on these lists or not.
Q) Do you believe there is scientific evidence of climate change, and is it caused by human activity? What is your position on the Paris climate change agreement?
A) There is evidence for climate change and it is worsened by human activity. I support the Paris Agreement.
Q) What changes, if any, to the U.S. tax code do you support and why?
A) I am opposed to any further increases in marginal income tax rates. The income tax rates are high enough as they are now for the middle class. I do think that millionaires and billionaires should pay more of their fair share. We do not have to change the U.S. Tax Code, however, to do this. All we have to do is interpret and enforce the Alternative Minimum Tax Law as it was originally intended several years ago.
Q) What are the most important actions Congress can take to ensure the solvency of Social Security?
A) Social Security should be removed from the general budget and general fund, where it has been since the 1960's. This enables the Congress to raid the Social Security Fund and use it for other purposes, mainly defense spending and wars in various parts of the world plus unnecessary foreign aid.
Social Security should be put in its own segregated fund as it was prior to the 1960's. The raiding of the Fund would therefore stop and this will guarantee the solvency of this program.
I also believe the disability program, which is now a part of Social Security, should be segregated into its own program and funding.
Q) Do you support a “risk fee” on big banks? Why or why not?
A) I agree with Senator Sanders that the big banks should be broken up. The risk fee is merely a partial compromise. We could have a risk fee on the banks prior to their being broken up.
It would be very difficult, however, to break up the New York banks because of the close relation between Washington and New York City. This power axis would have to be broken up first, in my opinion.
The best way to do this is relocate the Capitol of the United States to some other part of the country, hopefully in the Illinois region. We should transfer all of the business or office building type business from Washington to the central part of the United States to break up this Washington-New York City power axis. Only after that, could the banks be broken up as Senator Sanders proposes.
The tourist attractions (museums, monuments, Arlington Cemetery, etc) would remain in Washington.
Q) Should Obamacare be overturned, left intact, or changed — and if so how?
A) I campaigned for and I support most of Obamacare. The changes I would impose:
Eliminating the mandate. Obamacare should be voluntary and not mandated or required.
Opposing transfer of Medicare funds to Obamacare.
Decreasing the paperwork and computer work necessary that many doctors are inundated by at the present time.
Q) Do you favor stripping federal funds from Planned Parenthood? Why or why not?
A) I favor continuing to fund Planned Parenthood as it is now.
Q) President Obama used his executive powers to prevent the deportation of "DREAMers—youths who came to the U.S. illegally as children with their parents. Would you support legislation to prevent DREAMer deportations? Do you support putting DREAMers on a path to citizenship?
A) I would support the Dream Act and would not deport the DREAMers. These young people should be placed on a path to citizenship.
Q) What congressional reforms do you favor to address America’s student loan crisis?
A) First of all, we should try to encourage shorter periods of training for various professions. For doctors we should encourage 6 and 7 year programs rather than 8 year programs. Lawyers, accountants, businessmen and all other people requiring extra education could have shorter training periods and this would save money at the outset.
All student loans should be renegotiated. They should be pegged at the loan rates consistent with the ongoing rates in the 3 to 5% range rather than the 5 to 8% range as they are now.
Pell Grants should be increased and expanded. Type your paragraph here.